> >         $last = index $string, $substring, -1, -1;       # last occurence
   > 
   > Err... shouldn't that be 
   > 
   >     $last  = index $string, $substring, 0, -1  # last occurrence
   >     $first = index $string, $substring, -1, -1 # first occurrence found
   >                                                # in a perverse way
   > 
   > Or am I seeing double negatives where I shouldn't?

No. You're missing the fact that the third argument of rindex specifies
the last character at which the match can be found (as opposed to index's
third arg which specifies the *first* character from which to search)

Damian

Reply via email to