On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 11:29:40AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > I was figuring the taint/notaint pragma would control taint checking, while > -T would control taint setting. Probably not the best way--might be worth > unconditionally setting the taint status so a use/no taint would do the > right thing. Sounds reasonable. Graham.
- RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Matthew Cline
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Matthew Cline
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T John Tobey
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: On-the-fly tainting via $^T Tim Bunce
- Re: $^O and $^T variables (on-the-fly tainting) Chaim Frenkel
- Re: $^O and $^T variables (on-the-fly tainting) Nathan Wiger