I concur with Mike. If we *have* to have a prefix (and I *still* prefer a naked __, gumble, grumble, pout), then I'd certainly rather ^ that &. What we *really* need are some more types of brackets: $range = Ç__È < ÇvalÈ && ÇvalÈ < Ç__È; ;-) Damian
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Bart Lateur
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Bart Lateur
- Re: Different higher-order func ... John Porter
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Peter Scott
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Damian Conway
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (wa... Ken Fox
- Re: Different higher-order func notation?... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re... Peter Scott
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (was Re... Bart Lateur
- Re: Different higher-order func notation? (wa... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Damian Conway