On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 12:35:58AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I do *not* want to see any more obscenity of name calling here. It does > nothing to advance the purposes of this working group, and discourages > people from contributing. You're quite right, I went too far there. Yes, I was frustrated but that doesn't excuse bad language and behaviour. My apologies to all on the list. -- "So i get the chance to reread my postings to asr at times, with a corresponding conservation of the almighty leviam00se, Kai Henningsen." -- Megahal (trained on asr), 1998-11-06
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. skud
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. John Porter
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl... skud
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 28 (v1) Perl should stay Perl. Simon Cozens