At 04:02 AM 8/7/00 +0200, Bart Lateur wrote: >STRINGIFY would have my vote. "It's a string!!!". A string is a very >specific subtype of scalar. How about TO_STRING? Little less geeky. How would this play with overload.pm? What if that also specifies a stringify routine? Which one should win? -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin string SCALA Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin strin... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin s... Spider Boardman
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have built... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have b... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should h... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have built... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have b... Nathan Wiger
- Overloading && || Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Overloading && || Peter Scott
- Re: Overloading && |... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Overloading &&am... Peter Scott
- Re: Overloading && || Damian Conway
- Re: Overloading && || Damian Conway
- Re: Overloading && || Peter Scott
- Re: Overloading && || Dan Sugalski