On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 02:34:07PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
>
>that is a major reason why i want to move all of those rfc's under the
>flow one so we can properly address that low level design and language
>changes to support them all. i should have my draft rfc done later
>tonight and will post it. it has some missing sections you can fill in
>like on co-routines and completions.
uri, I fear you may be suffering from a bit of confusion wrt the current
state of sublists.
There is currently no such thing as a sub-sublist. perl6-language-flow
would not independently spawn perl6-language-flow-switch etc. Instead,
the chair of -flow could contact me and suggest a new sublist such as
perl6-language-switch, which would get its own chair and charter
independently of -flow.
I admit this isn't really very different in practical terms, but at
least it means that sublists have some consistentcy in their charters
and timelines, and that they all report back to the same place
(-language).
K.
--
Kirrily Robert -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://netizen.com.au/
Open Source development, consulting and solutions
Level 10, 500 Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000
Phone: +61 3 9614 0949 Fax: +61 3 9614 0948 Mobile: +61 410 664 994
