Re: RFC 2 (v1) Request For New Pragma: Implicit

[Bryan C . Warnock]

On Fri, 04 Aug 2000, Bart Lateur wrote:

> I think it's a bad idea. I would rather do it as the C64 did: use a very
> short function name as an alternative to "print".
> 
>       P "This gets printed!", "\n", "Yeah!\n";

> Unfortunately (for you), you can't use '?' because it would be
> ambiguous WRT the ?PATTERN? syntax.

Well, actually, I *did* start off using '?' for print.
(As Damian has proven time and again, import filters are wonderful
toys.  :-)


-- 
Bryan C. Warnock
([EMAIL PROTECTED])