> Unless I'm missing something here, you're not filling in the args correctly. > I think you mean: > > $check = sub (;$$$$) { > @_==0 ? __ < 2 + __ * atan($pi/__) or die __ > : @_==1 ? $_[0] < 2 + __ * atan($pi/__) or die __ > : @_==2 ? $_[0] < 2 + $_[1] * atan($pi/__) or die __ > : @_==3 ? $_[0] < 2 + $_[1] * atan($pi/$_[2]) or die __ > : $_[0] < 2 + $_[1] * atan($pi/$_[1]) or die $_[3] > ; > }; Yup. Cut-and-paste errors. Serves me right for posting at 3am. %-) > > Arguments other than the last can also be bound by the explicit use of > > placeholders: > > What do you mean 'other than the last'. Isn't your example showing that > _all_ the arguments can get bound? Sorry, what I meant was that, you can bind trailing arguments, just by omitting them. Non-trailing arguments have to be bound explicitly with an __. Damian
- RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order function... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions John Porter
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 23 (v1) Higher order functions Damian Conway
- Different higher-order func notation? (was Re... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order func notation?... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Different higher-order func notat... Mike Pastore
- Re: Different higher-order func ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Different higher-order f... Jeremy Howard