Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: > If implemented via source filters, $x < $y < $z would get translated > to $x < $y && $y < $z, which, of course, short circuits. No need for > "$y (but true)" (Although, we already have "0 but true" until someone > submits an RFC to remove it ;-) Why would we ever use source filters when we're going to have a beautiful extend-syntax macro system. (I hope!) Is anybody going to put out a macro RFC? The one I have in mind is R. Kent Dybvig's hygenic macro system for Chez Scheme. (There's a paper floating around here someplace. When I find it I'll post pointers to it.) - Ken
- RFC 25 (v1) Multiway comparisons Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway comparisons Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway comparisons John Porter
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway comparisons Jonathan Scott Duff
- RFC: "Empty But True" Speci... John Porter
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway comparisons Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway compari... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway com... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway com... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway comparisons Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway comparisons Martyn J. Pearce
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway comparisons Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway comparisons Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 25 (v1) Multiway comparisons Damian Conway