Myers, Dirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If a remove() is added, it should (IMHO) seek-and-destroy. This is impossible on a Unix file system. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone John Porter
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Bart Lateur
- RE: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Myers, Dirk
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Spider Boardman
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alon... Spider Boardman
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alon... Tim Jenness
- RE: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Russ Allbery
- RE: RFC 29 (v1) unlink() should be left alone Fisher Mark