>I hesitate to point out that the object who's method is called is the >actor, not what is acted upon. Therefore, we should be using the >nominative case, and go with $I :-) Actually, I'd argue dative (give $him "grief") or vocative ($brute->acting(qw/cassius strange/)). --tom
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re: named parameters) Damian Conway
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re: named paramete... Tom Christiansen
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re: named para... Graham Barr
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re: named para... Buddha Buck
- Tom Christiansen