On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Nathan Wiger wrote: > > sysopen() should probably be included in the list as well. > > Good point. > In fact, you may as well go the whole way and say that all IO is done via optimised IO objects (ie include sockets etc). IO::File and friends without the overhead. All of the current open functions simply pass these objects around. -- Tim Jenness JCMT software engineer/Support scientist http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Nathan Wiger
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Tom Christiansen
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Nathan Torkington
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Tom Christiansen
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Peter Scott
- Re: try/catch (Was: Re: RFC: Modify open(... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return handles Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return ha... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to retur... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to r... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to return ha... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Modify open() and opendir() to retur... Nathan Wiger