>>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> I think I'm missing the point. Why pull 'em out like that? Why not just put DS> the code in the body of the sub? Though a good post condition would benefit DS> from some sort of unconditional catch of return, I suppose. Perhaps DS> allowing continue on the outer sub block... Because the pre, post, invariants should only be executed, if and only if, the user requests it. Further, they are _not_ part of the sub, they are an external contract between the caller and the callee. <chaim> -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- Inner loop (was Re: type-checking [Was: What... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Tim Bunce
- RE: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Tony Payne
- RE: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Tim Jenness
- RE: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Tony Payne
- RE: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Tim Jenness
- RE: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Peter Scott
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Chaim Frenkel
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Peter Scott
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Dan Sugalski
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Chaim Frenkel
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Damian Conway
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Dan Sugalski
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Matthew Cline
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Piers Cawley
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Simon Cozens
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Michael Fowler
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Tom Christiansen
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Steve Fink
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] Michael Fowler
- Re: type-checking [Was: What is Perl?] skud