> > I disagree with keeping the same name as a Unix function, but having a > > radically different calling sequence or return value. If you want a > > new interface, *name* a new interface. > > Amen! Agreed, completely. I posted a follow-up under "Re: date interface" that some might be interested in (for those, like myself, viewing this in a massively threaded list format). -Nate
- Re: formats and localtime Simon Cozens
- Re: formats and localtime Matthew Persico
- Re: formats and localtime Chaim Frenkel
- Re: formats and localtime Damian Conway
- Re: formats and localtime Nathan Wiger
- Re: formats and localtime Tim Jenness
- Re: formats and localtime Robert Spier
- Re: formats and localtime Tim Jenness
- Re: formats and localtime Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: formats and localtime Tim Bunce
- Re: formats and localtime Nathan Wiger
- Re: formats and localtime Chaim Frenkel
- Re: formats and localtime Nathan Torkington
- Re: formats and localtime Larry Wall
- Re: formats and localtime Chaim Frenkel
- Re: formats and localtime Matthew Persico
- Re: formats and localtime Dan Sugalski
- Re: formats and localtime Damian Conway
- Re: formats and localtime Chaim Frenkel
- Re: formats and localtime Larry Wall
- Re: formats and localtime Chaim Frenkel