> > I disagree with keeping the same name as a Unix function, but having a
> > radically different calling sequence or return value.  If you want a
> > new interface, *name* a new interface.
> 
> Amen!

Agreed, completely. I posted a follow-up under "Re: date interface" that
some might be interested in (for those, like myself, viewing this in a
massively threaded list format).

-Nate

Reply via email to