Michael Fowler wrote: > I'm not sure exactly what you consider to be a "true multiline comment", but > Perl definitely has them by my definition. > > =pod > > Hi, this is a multiline comment. > > =cut ...and there are a lot WORSE ways to do this in current Perl: sub multiline-comment {} multiline-comment(<<END); Okay, this is my comment. Nasty. END So very much better to have a nice standard syntax and stop taking advantage of Perl's willingness to bend over backwards. ;-) ~ j.
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Martyn J. Pearce
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Barnette
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Barnette
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Glenn Linderman