Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I haven't looked at the internals for local, but isn't: > >{ > local $foo; > > ... >} > >effectively syntactic sugar for: > >{ > my $unnamed_foo = $foo; # $unnamed_foo not accessible > > ... > > $foo = $unnamed_foo; >} > >Is there something in the behavior of local I'm missing? There certainly is - that functions _called_ in the scope of the local see the $unnamed_foo as the value of $foo too. While hard to get ones brain round at first is is amazingly useful on occasion. -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Peter Scott
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks skud
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Tom Christiansen
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Ted Ashton
- RE: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Garrett Goebel
- RE: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Hildo Biersma
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asteris... Buddha Buck
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, ast... Sam Tregar
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, ast... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles,... Matthew Persico
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asteris... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, ast... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles,... Chaim Frenkel
- multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews