James Keenan via RT schrieb:
Hey, gang! Can anyone comment on the status of this ticket?
I agree that if a test file is 2400 lines long, there's a prima facie
case for splitting it into smaller components.
However, based on my experience and ptc's in cage-cleaning, I'd
recommend opening up individual RTs for test files that would benefit
subdividing. That way, we can more easily identify which test files
have been refactored and which remain to be done.
One of the problems with the Parrot-RT is that there are tickets that
linger on
and nobody knows whether they can be closed.
So opening, and quickly resolving, small and specific tickets is a good
idea.
I suggest to open specific tickets for each file that is a candidate for
refactoring
and add it as a dependency of the meta ticket #38982. Once the
dependencies are resolved,
the meta ticket can be resolved as well.
My 0.02 €
Bernhard
