Mark is correct. If the pcre-config program cannot be found, then this is the condition you should expect.
Note that libpcre does not come with OSX, so this is not unusual (I have it installed via Fink). Devin On Dec 20, 2007 8:48 AM, Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That output suggests that you dont have libpcre installed, which makes > it not much of a test for the patch. :) > > > > On 12/19/07, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon Dec 03 20:04:08 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Uploading updated version of patch based on discussion with chromatic on > > > perl6-internals mailing list. > > > > Devin: This is the result I got when I applied the 2nd version of your > > patch on Darwin and then ran the patched test file: > > > > [parrot] 516 $ prove -v t/library/pcre.t > > t/library/pcre....1..1 > > ok 1 # skip no pcre-config > > ok > > 1/1 skipped: various reasons > > All tests successful, 1 subtest skipped. > > Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.13 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.18 CPU) > > > > > > Is this output reasonable? Is it what I should expect? > > > > kid51 > > > > > -- > Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Devin J. Heitmueller http://www.devinheitmueller.com AIM: devinheitmueller