On Saturday 10 November 2007 05:21:00 Paul Cochrane wrote: > On 10/11/2007, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not a huge fan of this, especially when removing the RT #45591 link, > > but a better solution is to use the format %Ss, which tells Parrot's > > sprintf engine that it's getting a STRING. This avoids the memory leak > > of string_to_cstring().
> Ok, that's good to know. I'll go through and change the recent > commits of this kind to use %Ss which probably also means that I can > get rid of the ticket as well, right? Absolutely! -- c
