On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:40:17PM -0700, chromatic wrote: > ... except don't break CONST_STRING across lines, because apparently icc > can't > count and won't compile. > > One might assume that being able to count is less of a burden than handling > pointer math correctly, but I never took a compilers course so I could be > misisng something.
This would be the same icc that thinks that it's fair game to optimise so that NaN == NaN? Advice from Klortho #11912 applied there. That and its ability to claim to be gcc and then not support everything that gcc does continues to endear it to me. Nicholas Clark
