On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 22:48:42 +0100, liorean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CLR, JVM and C/C++ implementations exists. As parrot is supposed to be > better for dynamic languages, I guess EcmaScript 3.0 would fit right > in with parrot. It should. EcmaScript is also a relatively small language, which would work strongly in its advantage...
[snip] > I'd love to contribute. Could one write an initial compiler in > JavaScript, compile from SEE or SpiderMonkey and then run the compiler > on that implementation? What the compiler would do is to transform JS code into PIR ... you most likely could do that in any language, so another JS implementation wouldn't be impossible. -- Schwäche zeigen heißt verlieren; härte heißt regieren. - "Glas und Tränen", Megaherz
