Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STILL} trying to understand this...

[John Porter]

Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 10:55:52PM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> > 
> > I don't think it's that big a deal.  Easy enough to wrap in a macro.
> 
> I thought (hoped) that the plan was the avoid the cpp like the plague
> and cancer it is.  

Well, yes, definitely; but we're just adding an argument to the front
of the arg list.  Is that so bad?

-- 
John Porter