Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecode

[Dan Sugalski]

At 08:16 PM 9/26/00 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 02:04:58PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > What'd be a larger win would be if we have async I/O built into the core
> > I/O subsystem. That way we could queue up requests for blocks of data
> > (whatever data we want, in this case bytecode) and have them fetched while
> > we're parsing what's already been loaded.
>
>That's a succint version of what I was asking for. :)

Y'know, one of these days I'll read things completely and fully...

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk