Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Nick Ing-Simmons writes:
>: >It's not clear to me whether the intrinsic types should have a different
>: >solution to this than the extrinsic types.
>: 
>: _This_ thread is about using vtables for intrinsic types. If we cannot 
>: make them work there then the proposed innermost SV * replacment is flawed.
>
>Sure, but we may have to warp our ideas of what a vtable is to encompass
>the notion of a vtable that is the cross-product of two vtables.

That wouldn't be a 'vector' table but a 'matrix' table ! only 1/2 ;-)


>
>Larry
-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons

Reply via email to