Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >The rest is also there to optimize the common case. (Though I do think it's >overkill in many circumstances if all variables share the same base >structure--arrays don't really need an integer portion, neither do hashes) So you re-use the space for AvLEN or whatever is "hot" for arrays and hashes. >That's not a bad thing and, like I said, the big win's not in optimizing >scalars, it's in optimizing hashes and arrays. Skimping here's likely not >worth it in the long run. -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Ken Fox
- Re: RFC: Foreign objects in perl Dan Sugalski
- Ramblings on "base class" for SV etc. Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV etc. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV e... Larry Wall
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV etc. Ken Fox
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV e... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for ... Ken Fox
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ramblings on "base class&q... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Ramblings on "base class&q... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ramblings on "base class&q... Nick Ing-Simmons
- vtables (was Re: Ramblings on "... Uri Guttman
- Re: vtables (was Re: Ramblings on &... Dan Sugalski
- Re: vtables (was Re: Ramblings on &... Uri Guttman
- Re: vtables (was Re: Ramblings on &... Hildo Biersma
- Re: vtables (was Re: Ramblings on &... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ramblings on "base class&q... Chaim Frenkel