Re: RFC 35 / Re: perl6-internals-gc sublist

[Ken Fox]

Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I agree with this, though I'm pretty sure most scalars end up with multiple
> types. I'm up for either way, though--I think some test code is in order
> once things get a bit more hammered out. (I'd like to get some sample
> variable code put together in a few weeks, once the big things get laid out)

We should also instrument perl 5 and collect a large body of Perl 5 code
that we can measure. Has anybody done this already?

- Ken