Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yup, and I realized one of my big problems to GCs that move memory > (references that are pointers and such) really isn't, if we keep the > two-level variable structure that we have now. The 'main' SV structure > won't move, while the guts that the equivalent of sv_any points to can > without a problem. I certainly hope this data layout factoid is still subject to change. -John
- perl6-internals-gc sublist John Tobey
- Re: perl6-internals-gc sublist John Tobey
- Re: perl6-internals-gc sublist Dan Sugalski
- Re: perl6-internals-gc sublist Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl6-internals-gc sublist Dan Sugalski
- Re: perl6-internals-gc sublist John Tobey
- Re: perl6-internals-gc sublist Dan Sugalski
- Re: perl6-internals-gc sublist Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: perl6-internals-gc subl... John Tobey
- Re: RFC 35 / Re: perl6-inte... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 35 / Re: perl6-inte... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 / Re: perl6-inte... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 35 / Re: perl6-inte... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 / Re: perl6-inte... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 35 / Re: perl6-inte... John Tobey
- Re: RFC 35 / Re: perl6-inte... John Tobey