John Tobey wrote: > > Why is he bothering? A year to produce a prototype doesn't seem like a > > useful way to expend effort on something that isn't actually perl6. > > It is actually perl6 if/when it's finished. Right, so it isn't a community effort then, as you intend doing it all yourself. > > I'm not saying it was. However I don't see how the proposal would aid > > the migration - after all what he is writing will be neither perl5 nor > > perl6. > > I am not "writing". I am "transforming". Ok, so neither is it a rewrite. I suspect it won't be called perl6 in any case. Alan Burlison
- Re: Nick's performance theory ... John Tobey
- Re: Nick's performance theory ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Nick's performance theory ... John Tobey
- Re: Nick's performance theory ... Alan Burlison
- Re: inline mania Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- RE: inline mania Brent Fulgham
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Alan Burlison
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Alan Burlison
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- RE: inline mania Brent Fulgham
- RE: inline mania Brent Fulgham
- RE: inline mania Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: inline mania John Tobey