I agree, perl6 can be the glue language in academics which can be used to
showcase different computing concepts, be it methodologies - functional,
oops,procedural -, parallelism, VM, antlr etc.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016, 2:29 AM Peter Scott <pe...@psdt.com> wrote:

> I have seen Damian demonstrate how Perl 6 can be the best language for
> teaching functional, procedural, and object-oriented programming.
>
> On 1/19/2016 10:37 AM, Darren Duncan wrote:
> > I very much agree with this idea, of arguing Perl 6 as a teaching
> > language. Academia are the ones that would appreciate what Perl 6
> > offers the most in the short term, whereas industry would demand a
> > higher standard for it becoming popular.  And the first can lead to
> > the second. -- Darren Duncan
> >
> > On 2016-01-19 9:19 AM, Parrot Raiser wrote:
> >> I believe Damian Conway thinks P6 would be a very good CS teaching
> >> language.
> >>
> >> On 1/19/16, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Steve Mynott <steve.myn...@gmail.com
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> I think targeting Perl 6 at CS academic teachers is an excellent idea
> >>>> as a way of generally promoting use of the language.
> >>>>
> >>>> But I'd be wary of "bashing" current choices such as Python and don't
> >>>> believe any objective comparison of the two languages is possible.
> >>>>
> >>>> Python is in any case derived from ABC which was explicitly designed
> >>>> for teaching purposes.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not suggesting bashing Python, Steve, I just think some comparison
> >>> is necessary.
> >
>
>

Reply via email to