# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #126332]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# <URL: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126332 >
<loren> m: my &f := &substr.assuming('hello world'); say f(0, 2);
<camelia> rakudo-moar 70a94d: OUTPUT«hello world»
<moritz> m: say &substr.assuming('hello world')(0, 2)
<camelia> rakudo-moar 70a94d: OUTPUT«hello world»
<moritz> wtf (the "w" stands for "weird", here)
* moritz would have thought we had tests for assuming
<moritz> m: sub my-substr(*@a) { substr |@a }; say
&my-substr.assuming('hello, world')(1, 3)
<camelia> rakudo-moar 70a94d: OUTPUT«ello, world»
<moritz> so it only passes one more argument on to the original function?
<FROGGS> maybe assuming does not work well with multies?
<moritz> m: sub d(*@x) { say @x.perl }; &d.assuming('a', 'b')('c', 'd', 'e')
<camelia> rakudo-moar 70a94d: OUTPUT«["a", "b", "c"]»
<moritz> FROGGS: no
<moritz> FROGGS: it ignores anything from the second argument onwards
<FROGGS> m: multi f(1) {'a'}; multi f(1, 2) {'b'}; multi f(1, 2, 3)
{'c'}; say &f.assuming(1)(2, 3)
<camelia> rakudo-moar 70a94d: OUTPUT«b»
<FROGGS> m: multi f(1) {'a'}; multi f(1, 2) {'b'}; multi f(1, 2, 3)
{'c'}; say &f.assuming(1)(2, 3, 4)
<camelia> rakudo-moar 70a94d: OUTPUT«b»
<FROGGS> wow
<moritz> who wants to write the bug report?
* masak submits rakudobug
