On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But I've tried it and it works (but the syntax still bothers me for > now). Note that the same behavior applies to the 'substr' string > method so that begs the question of why is the 'substr-rw' method > justified and 'trim-rw' not? It seems at first glance that the > 'substr-rw' method should be removed. > IIRC substr-rw is a performance hack because substr was being slowed in all cases in order to accommodate the rw use case. trim doesn't have the same issue. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
