On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Timo Paulssen <t...@wakelift.de> wrote: > On 07/03/2015 07:20 PM, Tom Browder wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote: ... >> What is the proper type to use for the %hash for a more complete >> signature in function foo1? I've tried various types such ... > When you define a parameter with a % sigil or a @ sigil (or even a & > sigil) in your signature, you'll get the right kind of type restriction > "for free".
Okay, so that is fine then. > Hope that helps and I've also successfully predicted your next stumbling > block for you :) I think so, Timo--thanks! -Tom
