Thanks, I missed making the named arguments required in my initial example. What I thought was a "less than awesome" error was perfectly appropriate; with the named arguments being optional, no arguments meant the first MAIN ran and tried printing its uninitialized parameter.
-y On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Tom Browder <tom.brow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Perhaps you want that the named arguments are required rather than > ... > > Thanks, Pm! > > Best, > > -Tom >
