masak (>): > I am not 100% sure the `&block (Dog --> Bool)` form should work, > or is by spec. The `&block:(Dog --> Bool)` form comes from S06:1675.
<TimToady> at one point we required a : because of the ambiguity with sublists of parameters, but we already have a whitespace dep with @foo[3,3] vs @foo [$x,$y,$z], so having one for () is probably not terrible * masak adds TimToady's comment to the ticket
