On Sun Oct 23 10:07:07 2011, jn...@jnthn.net wrote:
> On Fri Oct 21 05:22:14 2011, masak wrote:
> > <jnthn> nom: enum Foo < a b >; class A { }; say A but Foo::a
> > <p6eval> nom e1a62b: OUTPUT«(signal SEGV)»
> > <jnthn> shit.
> > <jnthn> nom: enum Foo < a b >; class A { }; say A.new but Foo::a
> > <p6eval> nom e1a62b: OUTPUT«A+{<anon>}.new()»
> > <jnthn> nom: enum Foo < a b >; class A { }; say (A.new but Foo::a).Foo
> > <p6eval> nom e1a62b: OUTPUT«Foo::a»
> > <jnthn> grr, musta forgot the "no, you can't mix in to a type object"
> > detection somewhere
> > * masak submits rakudobug
>
> While we can catch it in Rakudo and maybe give a nicer error, the
> underlying segfault is now fixed:
>
> > enum Foo < a b >; class A { }; say A but Foo::a
> Cannot change the type of a type object
>
> Test needed to make sure it dies (and not segfaults).
>
> /jnthn
Test added in S12-enums/thorough.t
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
