On Tue Oct 04 17:48:14 2011, coke wrote:
> On Thu Aug 05 14:14:15 2010, masak wrote:
> > <ash_> rakudo: my $a = class { has $a; }; say $a.new(a => 1).perl; #
> > that looks funny too...
> > <p6eval> rakudo 19931f: OUTPUT«.new(a => 1)»
> > <ash_> but i have no idea what is "right", just looks funny...
> > * masak submits rakudobug
> > <pmichaud> rakudo: my $a = class { has $a; }; say $a.perl;
> > <p6eval> rakudo 19931f: OUTPUT«»
> >
> > On the principle that an eval should give you back what you started
> > with, probably both of these are wrong. Might not be easy or even
> > doable to get right, but we should probably avoid spitting out
> > something that we know will be eval'd wrongly. Might even be better to
> > die or fail in that case.
>
> These now output:
>
> 20:47 < [Coke]> rakudo: my $a = class { has $a; }; say $a.perl;
> 20:47 <+p6eval> rakudo 545638: OUTPUT«<anon>»
> 20:47 < [Coke]> rakudo: my $a = class { has $a; }; say $a.new(a => 1).perl;
> 20:47 <+p6eval> rakudo 545638: OUTPUT«<anon><-856690017062603138>»
Slight change:
01:21 <[Coke]> rakudo: my $a = class { has $a; }; say $a.perl;
01:21 <camelia> rakudo bfd850: OUTPUT«<anon>»
01:21 <[Coke]> rakudo: my $a = class { has $a; }; say $a.new(a => 1).perl;
01:21 <camelia> rakudo bfd850: OUTPUT«<anon>.new()»
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
