On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:29:47 -0600 "Patrick R. Michaud" <pmich...@pobox.com> wrote:
PRM> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 12:14:22PM -0500, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> >> Since I'm writing a module, I didn't think a one-liner was sufficient >> proof that state variables are reliable. Sorry I didn't make that >> clear. [...] PRM> Also, if the state variables currently behave as you expect, and we PRM> want to insure their reliability for the future, add a spectest to PRM> the "roast" suite. This way we'll also quickly discover if other PRM> Perl 6 implementations differ on this point. :-) Got it, thanks! Ted
