[perl #115740] bare '=pod' does not count as "abbreviated block"

[Carl Mäsak via RT]

On Thu Nov 15 05:14:34 2012, pawel.pab...@implix.com wrote:
> Rakudo 2012.10
> 
> bbkr_ r: =pod
> p6eval        rakudo c82d10: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Preceding context 
expects a
> term, but found infix = instead␤at /tmp/eqe30h6iti:1␤»
> bbkr_ std: =pod
> p6eval        std 04216b1: OUTPUT«ok 00:00 40m␤»
> bbkr_ which one is incorrect? should bare =pod (without closing =end
> tag) be allowed?
> masak I don't think STD does any Pod parsing.
> bbkr_ then it's LTA rakudo message, right?
> masak possibly.
> *     bbkr_ reports
> masak I'd like to hear what tadzik has to say about it.
> masak the above should count as "abbreviated block" syntax, I think.
> as far as I see, it shouldn't need an ending delimiter, because
> abbreviated blocks auto-close.

<moritz> it's the missing newline, not p6eval ;-)
<masak> r: =pod␤
<p6eval> rakudo c82d10:  ( no output )
<masak> so, no bug.
* masak rejects ticket