> At least in #perl6 I've never seen anybody try to write an auto-deduced > sequence, and fail because of floating-point errors.
Except for Martin's 1, sqrt(2), 2...8 But, yes, the widespread use of Rats rather than Nums means only the edgiest of edge-cases fails. And as you get an explicit Failure when it does happen, at least people will know when the numerical computations don't work as hoped. Damian
