Help us always-explains-the-joke-man!!... :)
Philippe R. Beauchamp Secure Channel | Bell Business Markets Associate Director - Application Services Phone: 613-781-8953 Cell: 613-327-6928 ----- Original Message ----- From: Moritz Lenz [mailto:mor...@faui2k3.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 04:56 AM To: perl6-langu...@perl.org <perl6-langu...@perl.org> Subject: Re: [perl6/specs] a7cfe0: [S32] backtraces overhaul Am 23.08.2011 10:46, schrieb Damian Conway: > It's a trivial point, but why hidden_from_backtrace instead of > hidden-from-backtrace? Especially given that the associated > method is is-hidden, not is_hidden? The current stance seems to be that low-level things are spelled with underscores, while we reserve the minus character for user-space code. Try grepping the specs for identifiers of built-ins that have a minus in it -- I didn't find any in a quick search. > And why is this entire message written in questions? Is it? I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean. See https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/a7cfe02002f665c120cf4b735919779820194757 maybe it's a charset problem on your machine, or something. Cheers, Moritz
