Patrik (>):
> Your link seems to specifiy how empty patterns are illegal. However,
> reading the :sigspace definition, I assume that rule {[ |a]+} is
> eqivalent to token {[<.ws>|a]+}, which not contains any empty pattern.

I find nothing in the spec that addresses this case specifically.
(Though I might have simply missed it.)

However, I expect *any* alternations on the form /[ |a]/ to simplify
to just /[a]/, so I don't agree with your equivalence above. More
generally, nowhere in Perl 6 regexes does a regex (or alternation
alternative, or capture, or group, etc) containing *only* whitespace
correspond to <.ws> -- instead, it's illegal.

The fact that Rakudo sometimes erroneously accepts such regexes helps
confuse matters a bit. The fact that /[ |a]/ is a legal special case
meaning /[a]/ helps confuse things a bit further.

// Carl

Reply via email to