On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Jon Lang <datawea...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Carl Mäsak wrote:
> > Jonathan Lang (>):
> >> That saves a singlr character over Bag( ... ) and Set( ... ),
> >> respectively (or three characters, if you find decent unicode bracket
> >> choices).  It still wouldn't be a big enough deal to me to bother with
> >> it.
> >
> > +1. Let's leave it at that.
>
> That said, I do think that Bag( ... ) should be able to take pairs, so
> that one can easily create a Bag that holds, say, twenty of a given
> item, without having to spell out the item twenty times.


  Doesn't the xx operator cover this?


Eirik

Reply via email to