A few additional items that I've tweaked in a forked copy:

http://github.com/ajs/book

Just some awkward bits that I've tried to make less so.

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Aaron Sherman <a...@ajs.com> wrote:
> Last night I was looking over the book, and a few cases in src/operators.pod
> where code is spaced so that operators line up vertically. This seems
> reasonable in concept, but in practice this code comes right after the
> precedence section and that makes it look confusing to me. For example:
>
>     say 3   === 3;     # 1
>     say 'a' === 'a';   # 1
> Really emphasizes "say 3" and seems to imply that "say 3" and "=== 3" are
> distinct in some way. I think this would be just as readable if it were:
>     say 3 === 3;       # 1
>     say 'a' === 'a';   # 1
> There's no particular reason to line up the === operators, I think. This
> occurs again, later on:
>     say 10   <=> 5;       # +1
>     say 10   leg 5;       # because '1' lt '5'
>     say 'ab' leg 'a';     # +1, lexicographic comparison
> And again, I don't think there's a real need to line up the operators, here.
> On an unrelated note, m-dashes and n-dashes are mixed together in the
> resulting document in ways that I don't fully understand. It looks like
> spaces around the "--" may be to blame, here. It looks like unspaced (such
> as it is just before "an object representing that file" in basics.pod) the
> -- becomes an n-dash and when surrounded by whitespace (e.g. in
> operators.pod before "after reading the chapter") it becomes an m-dash, but
> that's just a guess.
> What's frustrating, about that is that "comparisons—== and eq—there" from
> the output of operators.pod is very hard to read either way, even though
> it's fine in the POD. I think parentheticals might be better suited and less
> prone to the vagaries of typesetting in many of these cases. In other cases
> commas might suit just as well, e.g.:
>
> "The upshot of this is that, after reading the chapter on writing classes
> and methods, you ..."
>
> I have some additional comments that I'm going to send tonight as diffs,
> since they address the language used in several places, rather than
> structural/formatting elements as above.
> --
> Aaron Sherman
> Email or GTalk: a...@ajs.com
> http://www.ajs.com/~ajs
>
>



-- 
Aaron Sherman
Email or GTalk: a...@ajs.com
http://www.ajs.com/~ajs

Reply via email to