On Thu Jun 25 15:43:59 2009, viklund wrote:
> -- code --
> class A {
> method a(*...@a) {
> say "A self={self.perl} ar...@a.perl}"
> }
> }
>
> class B is A {
> method a(*...@a) {
> nextwith("FIRST ARG", "SECOND ARG")}
> }
>
> B.new.a()
>
> -- output --
>
> A self="FIRST ARG" arg=["SECOND ARG"]
>
> -- what I expected --
>
> A self=B.new() arg=["FIRST ARG", "SECOND ARG"]
>
> -- comment --
>
> If you are supposed to supply self as the first argument to nextwith
> for this to work, I think I should get a "Method not found" error in
> this case.
>
Yes, it was supposed to give the output you expected, but failed to due
to a bug. Fixed in git 48c1791 and added an example like this as a
regression test too (plus similar one for callwith).
Thanks,
Jonathan
