On Sat Jul 26 06:15:06 2008, jn...@jnthn.net wrote: > On Fri Jul 25 20:58:01 2008, pmichaud wrote: > > Given that this is a failed assertion (as opposed to > > a thrown exception), I'm not sure that we -can- catch > > this at the Rakudo level. I think Parrot should be > > throwing an exception here. > Me to, so I've changed it so that this happens. So now I guess we need > to catch it at a Rakudo level. > > I'd imagine this is one of these things that we want to catch, and then > use "fail" so we either return an unthrown exception, or if "use fatal" > is in effect throw it. > And now in line with S32, you get a failure object as of git 7b9f811. Resolving ticket.
Jonathan
