Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:52:45PM -0800, Todd Hepler wrote: >> I think this is a bug, but I'm not sure. >> >> (undef === undef) currently evaluates to false. Seem like it should be >> true. >> >> I couldn't find a test for it, so below is a patch to add one. > > Before entering a fix for this, I'm curious if (undef =:= undef) > should evaluate to true or false?
It should fail, because undef isn't a container, and =:= only operates on containers. Cheers, Moritz
