chromatic wrote:
On Saturday 13 September 2008 04:51:04 Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
Another question: there is a lot of PMC_\S+_val accesses to Key pmc.
Should they be replaced with VTABLE analogues as well? Or Key isn't
supposed to be inherited by some other class and it will only sacrifice
performance?
The Key PMC is a confused beast; sometimes it holds an INTVAL, sometimes a
STRING, and sometimes it's a PMC. Skip that one for now -- I think we need
to do something special there.
Ok.
What about *array classes? I not quite understand logick inside...
And another question. Should all lvalue occurences of PMC_*_val(SELF) be
replaced with VTABLE_set_*_native? (Except for VTABLE method
implementation of cause)
--
Bacek
