On Tue Jul 01 18:34:25 2008, coke wrote: > > I would err on the side of removing them. No point in keeping unused > items after the refactor, especially if you're going to end up having > to write tests for them. Especially since eventually we're not (as I > understand it) going to use ICU. >
Well, if we're not going to be using ICU, then WTF have I been doing for the past five days? This is the first I've heard of this. If I had know we were not going to use ICU, we could have simply chucked the config step. Instead, I sweated (quite literally, given NYC weather) all weekend refactoring it. I suppose I should ask: Are there any *other* config steps you want removed rather than refactored? kid51
