--- Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is an updated version, as well as an example chart it > creates. > This is not as pretty as the previous version, but it's more > informative. > If there are significant number of failed tests, I could also include > their number. > > Any comments?
Looks great. However, from a testing perspective, I'm wondering why there is such a huge number of skipped tasks. Shouldn't those be TODO tasks? Skips are really easy to ignore and it's virtually impossible to know if they'll ever pass but TODO tests unexpectedly succeeding tend to stand out. That being said, skips should be in place if, say, you have a Win32 test on Linux, but skips should be rare. Here almost half the tests are skips and I don't know why. Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Personal blog - http://publius-ovidius.livejournal.com/ Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/
