On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:36 PM, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon Jun 09 17:23:40 2008, coke wrote: > >> >> I think the goal is to eliminate warnings from the default build, >> while turing on as many warnings as possible. (like with the coding >> standard tests; as more pass, we should run them by default.) >> > > So does this mean I should not have resolved this ticket? >
I don't know, honestly. =-) I'd like us to be tracking it someplace, and RT seems like the best place. I'm sure we can strike a balance between a ticket for every warning and one monolithic squash warnings ticket. Assuming of course that I got Andy Lester's intent right here. -- -- Will "Coke" Coleda
